BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news312@kunstgeschichte.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20210312T143422
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20210323T180000
SUMMARY:Images in Space (with Nikolaus Dietrich\, Heidelberg) 
DESCRIPTION:Modern Western reflections on the nature of images have predomi
 nantly focused on pictures\, that is\, images on flat surfaces\, as paradi
 gmatic examples of depiction. Discussions of images with three-dimensional
  supports have thus often been derivative or completely sidestepped. The a
 im of this series of talks is to shift focus to three-dimensional images 
 ‘in the round’ like sculptures\, figurines\, or models\, and to invest
 igate the specifics\, whatever they may be\, that issue from their 3D natu
 re. Of interest will be anthropological\, historical\, as well as philosop
 hical approaches. Some of the relevant questions include: In what aspects 
 has a production/reception/circulation of spatial images differed from pic
 tures? Is thereanything specific about 3D image vehicles that a depiction 
 theory should reflect? How have various histories and anthropologies of im
 ages succeeded or failed to recognize the difference?
X-ALT-DESC:<p>Modern Western reflections on the nature of images have predo
 minantly focused on pictures\, that is\, images on flat surfaces\, as para
 digmatic examples of depiction. Discussions of images with three-dimension
 al supports have thus often been derivative or completely sidestepped. The
  aim of this series of talks is to shift focus to three-dimensional images
  ‘in the round’ like sculptures\, figurines\, or models\, and to inves
 tigate the specifics\, whatever they may be\, that issue from their 3D nat
 ure. Of interest will be anthropological\, historical\, as well as philoso
 phical approaches. Some of the relevant questions include: In what aspects
  has a production/reception/circulation of spatial images differed from pi
 ctures? Is thereanything specific about 3D image vehicles that a depiction
  theory should reflect? How have various histories and anthropologies of i
 mages succeeded or failed to recognize the difference?</p>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20210323T193000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR