BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Sabre//Sabre VObject 4.5.8//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Zurich
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Zurich
TZURL:http://tzurl.org/zoneinfo/Europe/Zurich
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19810329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19961027T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:news562@kunstgeschichte.philhist.unibas.ch
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260415T102309
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260611T000000
SUMMARY:Aesthetics of Facts and the Medieval Image
DESCRIPTION:The age of artificial intelligence with its dissemination of sy
 nthetic visual media forces those who are exposed to them to question the 
 truth value of the visible. Consequent discussions concerning images and t
 heir authenticity\, authority and potential as frauds are being catalyzed 
 among regulators\, image theorists\, artists and the general public. What 
 often goes unnoticed in these deliberations is that similar discussions we
 re flaring up at different points in the global past\, certainly during th
 e Western Middle Ages - then\, for example\, debates concerning the realit
 y of the sacred presence claimed to be contained in certain material thing
 s\, were common. At the same time\, visual objects were often forged to at
 test to an individual’s or a group’s - not always legitimate - claims 
 for privilege. The capacity of an image to be perceived as representing tr
 uth is subject to cultural norms\; medieval and contemporary norms are sig
 nificantly different. But much like in our times\, in the Middle Ages thos
 e who understood that truths could have predictable visual forms employed 
 this knowledge to fabricate images claiming to represent theological\, sci
 entific\, legal or historical “facts.”\\r\\nThe conference Aesthetics 
 of Facts and the Medieval Image is designed as an exploration of both the 
 conditions due to which certain images claimed their viewer’s trust\, an
 d their manipulation. We seek to examine approaches to truth in images in 
 the pre-photographic\, pre-industrial Middle Ages\, expressed in images\, 
 texts and practices. Nevertheless\, speakers are encouraged to think with 
 ideas\, questions and terms prompted by the current discourse on AI-genera
 ted imagery\, which allow us to rethink medieval evaluations of the “rea
 l” in the visual. The conference will address such questions as: What co
 nditions conferred a factual status upon certain medieval images or their 
 contents? What about the appearance of such images shaped their efficacy\,
  and perception as sacred images\, material historic or legal evidence\, a
 nd other visual embodiments of proclaimed truth? What were the limits of t
 he representable in the Middle Ages? And how was the production of images 
 regulated\, given their potential to deceive\, confuse and persuade?\\r\\n
 Detailed program to follow.
X-ALT-DESC:<p>The age of artificial intelligence with its dissemination of 
 synthetic visual media forces those who are exposed to them to question th
 e truth value of the visible. Consequent discussions concerning images and
  their authenticity\, authority and potential as frauds are being catalyze
 d among regulators\, image theorists\, artists and the general public. Wha
 t often goes unnoticed in these deliberations is that similar discussions 
 were flaring up at different points in the global past\, certainly during 
 the Western Middle Ages - then\, for example\, debates concerning the real
 ity of the sacred presence claimed to be contained in certain material thi
 ngs\, were common. At the same time\, visual objects were often forged to 
 attest to an individual’s or a group’s - not always legitimate - claim
 s for privilege. The capacity of an image to be perceived as representing 
 truth is subject to cultural norms\; medieval and contemporary norms are s
 ignificantly different. But much like in our times\, in the Middle Ages th
 ose who understood that truths could have predictable visual forms employe
 d this knowledge to fabricate images claiming to represent theological\, s
 cientific\, legal or historical “facts.”</p>\n<p>The conference Aesthe
 tics of Facts and the Medieval Image is designed as an exploration of both
  the conditions due to which certain images claimed their viewer’s trust
 \, and their manipulation. We seek to examine approaches to truth in image
 s in the pre-photographic\, pre-industrial Middle Ages\, expressed in imag
 es\, texts and practices. Nevertheless\, speakers are encouraged to think 
 with ideas\, questions and terms prompted by the current discourse on AI-g
 enerated imagery\, which allow us to rethink medieval evaluations of the 
 “real” in the visual. The conference will address such questions as: W
 hat conditions conferred a factual status upon certain medieval images or 
 their contents? What about the appearance of such images shaped their effi
 cacy\, and perception as sacred images\, material historic or legal eviden
 ce\, and other visual embodiments of proclaimed truth? What were the limit
 s of the representable in the Middle Ages? And how was the production of i
 mages regulated\, given their potential to deceive\, confuse and persuade?
 </p>\n<p>Detailed program to follow.</p>
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Zurich:20260612T000000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
